Accès gratuit
Numéro
Colon Rectum
Volume 10, Numéro 1, Février 2016
Recommandations pour la pratique clinique - Cancer du rectum
Page(s) 35 - 41
Section Dossier Thématique / Thematic File
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-015-0618-y
Publié en ligne 15 décembre 2015
  • Morino M, Risio M, Bach S, et al (2015). Early rectal cancer: the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) clinical consensus conference. Surg Endosc 29 :755–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Arezzo A, Passera R, Saito Y, et al (2014). Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions. Surg Endosc 28 :427–38 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Darwood RJ, Wheeler JM, Borley NR (2008). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a safe and reliable technique even for complex rectal lesions. Br J Surg 95 :915–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marks JH, Frenkel JL, Greenleaf CE, et al (2014) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery with entrance into the peritoneal cavity: is it safe? Dis Colon Rectum 57 :1176–82 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Christoforidis D, Cho HM, Dixon MR, et al (2009). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus conventional transanal excision for patients with early rectal cancer. Ann Surg 249 :776–82 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ishikawa Y, Akishima-Fukasawa Y, Ito K, et al (2008). Histopathologic determinants of regional lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer. Cancer 112 :924–33 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sohn DK, Chang HJ, Park JW, et al (2007). Histopathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma of pedunculated or semipedunculated type. J Clin Pathol 60 :912–5 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Beaton C, Twine CP, Williams GL, et al (2013). Systematic review and meta-analysis of histopathological factors influencing the risk of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 15 :788–97 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ueno H, Hashiguchi Y, Kajiwara Y, et al (2010). Proposed objective criteria for “grade 3” in early invasive colorectal cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 134 :312–22 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Kato T, et al (2010). Is total mesorectal excision always necessary for T1-T2 lower rectal cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 17 :973–80 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kazama S, Watanabe T, Ajioka Y, et al (2006). Tumour budding at the deepest invasive margin correlates with lymph node metastasis in submucosal colorectal cancer detected by anticytokeratin antibody CAM5.2. Br J Cancer 94 :293–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morino M, Allaix ME, Caldart M, et al (2011). Risk factors for recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal malignant neoplasm. Surg Endosc 25 :3683–90 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Reddy JB, et al (2009). How good is endoscopic ultrasound in differentiating various T stages of rectal cancer? Meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 16 :254–65 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor FG, Quirke P, Heald RJ, et al (2011). Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone: a prospective, multicenter, European study. Ann Surg 253 :711–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Halefoglu AM, Yildirim S, Avlanmis O, et al (2008). Endorectal ultrasonography versus phased-array magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 14 :3504–10 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J, et al (1984). A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation. Chirurgy 55 :677–80 [Google Scholar]
  • Allaix ME, Rebecchi F, Giaccone C, et al (2011). Long-term functional results and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg 98 :1635–43 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR, et al (2015). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58 :254–61 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, et al (2010). A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72 :1217–25 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hahnloser D, Wolff BG, Larson DW, et al (2005). Immediate radical resection after local excision of rectal cancer: an oncologic compromise? Dis Colon Rectum 48 :429–37 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • van Gijn W, Brehm V, de Graaf E, et al (2013). Unexpected rectal cancer after TEM: outcome of completion surgery compared with primary TME. Eur J Surg Oncol 39 :1225–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Piessen G, Cabral C, Benoist S, et al (2012). Previous transanal full-thickness excision increases the morbidity of radical resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 14 :445–52 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Levic K, Bulut O, Hesselfeldt P, et al (2013). The outcome of rectal cancer after early salvage TME following TEM compared with primary TME: a case-matched study. Tech Coloproctol 17 :397–403 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hompes R, McDonald R, Buskens C, et al (2013). Completion surgery following transanal endoscopic microsurgery: assessment of quality and short- and long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 15: e576–81 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun Myint A, Grieve RJ, McDonald AC, et al (2007). Combined modality treatment of early rectal cancer: the UK experience. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 19 :674–81 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.