Authentification abonné
lvcer
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 10 / Numéro 1 (Février 2016) Colon Rectum, 10 1 (2016) 28-34 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Colon Rectum
Volume 10, Numéro 1, Février 2016
Recommandations pour la pratique clinique - Cancer du rectum
Page(s) 28 - 34
Section Dossier Thématique / Thematic File
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-015-0623-1
Publié en ligne 13 janvier 2016
  • Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, et al (2008) Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3517–22 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Juul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S, et al (2014) International validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Ann Surg 259:728–34 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosen H, Robert-Yap J, Tentschert G, et al (2011) Transanal irrigation improves quality of life in patients with low anterior resection syndrome. Colorect Dis 13: e335–8 [Google Scholar]
  • Allgayer H, Dietrich CF, Rohde W, et al (2005) Prospective comparison of short- and long-term effects of pelvic floor exercise/biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence after surgery plus irradiation versus surgery alone for colorectal cancer: clinical, functional and endoscopic/endosonographic findings. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:1168–75 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pucciani F, Ringressi MN, Redditi S, et al (2008) Rehabilitation of fecal incontinence after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: encouraging results. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1552–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim KH, Yu CS, Yoon YS, et al (2011) Effectiveness of biofeedback therapy in the treatment of anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1107–13 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Denost Q, Laurent C, Capdepont M, et al (2011) Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:963–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. New Engl J Med 351:1731–40 [Google Scholar]
  • Sailer M, Fuchs KH, Fein M, et al (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing quality of life after straight and pouch coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 89:1108–17 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen TY, Wiltink LM, Nout RA, et al (2015) Bowel function 14 years after preoperative short-course radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Colorect Cancer 14:106–14 [Google Scholar]
  • Brown CJ, Fenech DS, McLeod RS. (2008) Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews CD006040 [Google Scholar]
  • Seow-Choen F, Goh HS (1995) Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 82:608–10 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ortiz H, De Miguel M, Armendariz P, et al (1995) Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch? Dis Colon Rectum 38:375–7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hallbook O, Pahlman L, Krog M, et al (1996) Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 224:58–65 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lazorthes F, Gamagami R, Chiotasso P, et al (1997) Prospective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1409–13 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tan M (2001) Colonic J-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: randomized controlled trial. W J Surg 25:876–81 [Google Scholar]
  • Ho YH, Tan M, Leong AF, Seow-Choen F (2000) Ambulatory manometry in patients with colonic J-pouch and straight coloanal anastomoses: randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 43:793–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Furst A, Burghofer K, Hutzel L, et al (2002) Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 45:660–7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oya M, Komatsu J, Takase Y, et al (2002) Comparison of defecatory function after colonic J-pouch anastomosis and straight anastomosis for stapled low anterior resection: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surg Today 32:104–10 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huttner FJ, Tenckhoff S, Jensen K, et al (2015) Meta-analysis of reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 102:735–45 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Doeksen A, Bakx R, Vincent A, et al (2012) J-pouch vs side-to-end coloanal anastomosis after preoperative radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicentre randomized trial. Colorect Dis 14:705–13 [Google Scholar]
  • Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–45 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–26 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–45 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15:767–74 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bregendahl S, Emmertsen KJ, Lindegaard JC, et al (2015) Urinary and sexual dysfunction in women after resection with and without preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Colorect Dis 17:26–37 [Google Scholar]
  • Herman JM, Narang AK, Griffith KA, et al (2013) The quality-of-life effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer. Internat J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85: e15–9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, et al (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92:1124–32 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Andersson J, Abis G, Gellerstedt M, et al (2014) Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II). Br J Surg 101:1272–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kirby MG, White ID, Butcher J, et al (2014) Development of UK recommendations on treatment for post-surgical erectile dysfunction. Internat J Clin Pract 68:590–608 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P (2012) Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 12: CD004323 [Google Scholar]
  • Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, et al (2005) Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg 241: 465–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.